Winnebagoland Conservation Alliance

~ Newsletter ~

EPA Proposes Vessel Discharge Permits

We should all take heed!    Without the pleasure boat exemption and $800.00 fee per boat would be a pretty hefty fee.  Call Kohl and Feingold and object to the fee.

Mike Arrowood

GLSFC Special Bulletin

June 21, 2008

EPA Proposes Vessel Discharge Permits

Hosting Clean Water Act meetings, posts notice in Federal Register

Washington, DC ---The U.S. EPA is proposing two general permits under the Clean Water Act that will cover discharges incidental to normal operation of commercial and recreational vessels. Based on agency estimates, as many as 91,000 commercial vessels and about 13 million recreational boats could be affected.

''EPA is proposing a practical approach as we work with Congress on a longer-term, comprehensive solution," said Assistant Administrator for Water Benjamin H. Grumbles. "We believe it is good environmental policy and common sense to promote clean boating without imposing new permits on millions of boaters."

As a result of a court ruling currently under appeal, vessel owners or operators whose discharges have previously been exempt from Clean Water Act requirements for the last 35 years will require a permit as of September 30, 2008. EPA is proposing control technologies and management practices that enhance environmental protection and are practical to implement.

The commercial and large recreational vessel general permit (VGP) would cover all commercial vessels and recreational vessels 79 ft or longer. For vessels that carry ballast water, it would incorporate the Coast Guard mandatory ballast water management and exchange standards, and have supplemental ballast water requirements. The VGP would provide technology-based and water-quality-based effluent limits for other types of discharges including deck runoff, bilgewater, gray water and other types of pollutants. The permit also establishes specific corrective actions, inspections and monitoring requirements as well as recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Only a subset of the vessels potentially affected by this permit will have to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage; for all the other vessels their coverage would be automatic.

The permit for smaller recreational vessels measuring less than 79 ft in length contains simpler provisions. These smaller vessels, which are substantially different in both size and operation from larger vessels, would need to comply with new and established best management practices. In addition, these smaller vessels would not be required to submit a Notice of Intent for coverage under the permit; their coverage would be automatic.

EPA is inviting comments on both proposed permits for a period of 45 days. EPA will be holding public meetings and a hearing starting June 19.

Written Comments must be submitted by August 1, 2008

Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ- OW-2008-0055 for the VGP or Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0056 for the RGP, by one of the following methods:

http://www.regulations.gov : Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov .

●Mail: Original and three copies to: Water Docket, EPA, Mail Code: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.

Federal Register notice: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/regulations/vessel_frnotice.pdf

Meeting times and dates:

Thursday, June 19, 2008, 8:00 - 4:30 PM, EPA East Bldg, Rm 1153, 1201 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20004

Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 8:00 - 4:30 PM , Red Lion Hotel-Portland Convention Ctr. 1021 NE Grand Ave, Portland, OR 97232
Thursday, June 26, 2008, 8:00 - 4:30 PM, Ave Hotel, 160 E. Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611
Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 12:00 Noon - 1:30 PM EDT, Live Webcast
Go to www.epa.gov/npdes/training  on or about June 18 for information on how to register and attend the web cast
Monday, July 21, 2008, 8:00 - 4:30 PM, EPA East Bldg, Rm 1153, 1201 Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20004

Information on the permits and meetings: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/vessels

The Federal Register notice: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/regulations/vessel_frnotice.pdf

Also, go to: http://www.boatblue.org/  A service of NMMA

Dan Thomas, President
Great Lakes Sport Fishing Council

dan@great-lakes.org

Cooperative study suggests Wisconsin’s black bear population is larger than thought
MADISON – Preliminary results of a two-year cooperative study of Wisconsin black bears suggest that the population may be two times or more larger than currently thought. Biologists stress that the new estimate comes from a half finished study and may change when data from the second year of the study are analyzed. Early results are encouraging, however, and indicate Wisconsin continues to provide quality habitat for large mammals like bears.

“This is good news,” said Keith Warnke, Department of Natural Resources deer and bear ecologist. “It means we have a healthy bear population, and we may be able to expand bear hunting opportunity. The other good news is that more people will have opportunities to see these great animals in the wild.”

The two-year, DNR-funded study was conducted by University of Wisconsin-Madison Wildlife Ecology graduate student Dave MacFarland under the guidance of Dr. Timothy Van Deelen.

“The preliminary results are comparable to bear densities in Minnesota and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula,” said Van Deelen. “Dave and I spent a good deal of time rechecking our calculations and we’re eager to see if the results hold when the second year of data are incorporated.”

In the bear study, some 3,500 baits marked with tetracycline were set out across the state’s bear range in 2006. Tetracycline, when ingested, is harmless to bears but leaves a telltale line in a bear’s bones. Successful bear hunters in 2006 and 2007 were asked to provide a section of a rib bone from bears they harvested for analysis. From those samples, the biologists were able to use a formula to calculate the estimated bear population.

Using tetracycline is a variation on a wildlife population estimating technique known as mark and recapture. Other examples of mark and recapture are banding of waterfowl and songbirds and radio collars or radio implants on other species. When hunters report harvesting a banded game bird or biologists recapture a banded songbird, that information is used in a model to estimate total populations.

Currently, biologists track black bear populations by placing a series of baits on routes in each county throughout the black bear’s range and record which are consumed by bears over a week long observation period. Biologists use these observations to help build a population model that also takes into account hunter harvest, hunter success rates, bear population data and historical harvest rates to generate a population estimate. This model estimates the current black bear population in Wisconsin to be at about 13,000.

“It is important to keep in mind that these models both provide information for us to consider when managing the bear population, and both are important to scientific bear management,” Warnke said. “We are always working to improve the science we have to manage wildlife populations. The department funded the research to improve our bear population estimate and expand the science base we have on this species. The Wisconsin Bear Hunters Association was a key collaborator on this study and many members participated in gathering data and contributing research supplies. I’d also like to thank Dave MacFarland for organizing and conducting this research and his help in enlisting cooperation from the bear hunters.”

In the tetracycline study, a much larger number of bait stations were used and the bait stations were constructed in a way that only bears could reach the bait. The new study also carefully adjusted the amount of bait so that a single bear would likely consume all of it in one visit, greatly reducing the possibility that one bait might mark two bears. By comparing the number of baits consumed in a season to the number of harvested bears showing the tetracycline marker in their bones, scientists were able to calculate the new population estimate.

Officials stress that these are preliminary findings and it is too early to draw conclusions or implement changes. The earliest possible changes that would impact bear hunting permit availability would be for the 2009 hunting season. Adjusting black bear population goals will necessitate changes to administrative rules and involve public meetings, and Natural Resources Board and legislative approval.

“When the final results are in we’ll be able to use this information to assess bear population goals and adapt our bear management program,” says Warnke. “Any changes to bear management policies will be done carefully, with public input and only after thorough analysis of potential impacts. The first priority is and always will be conservation of the resource.”

“Our bear population is expanding and one benefit of that is that people can expect to see bears in areas outside what is thought of as traditional range,” Warnke said. “Despite bears’ general shyness toward humans, people in the central and southwest areas of the state likely can expect to see more evidence of bears as they disperse, looking for new territories.”

Adult black bears typically weigh 250 to 500 pounds for males (boars) and 200 to 450 pounds for females (sows). Infant bears, called cubs, are born quite tiny but by the time they are 2 months old, they weigh about 6 pounds. Females give birth to two or three cubs in January or February when they are still in their winter sleep. When standing on all four paws, adult bears measure 2 to 3 feet tall at their shoulders.    

Keith Warnke

Bureau of Wildlife Management
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
WM/6, BOX 7921
Madison, WI 53707
phone: 608.264.6023
fax: 608.267.7857

March 31, 2008

We launched our new website today, now we need your help on gathering the information to finish the job.

 

Need the following from Alliance members:

  • Name:

  • Logo:

  • Address:

  • Telephone:

  • Email Address:

  • Contact:

  • Activities/Purpose/Mission:

  • Events:

  • Website:

If your club does not have a webpage you will end up with one hosted by us!! Click Here With Your Answers

The Alliance website will only be as good as the information that we receive!